What's this? A Book!
Or buy here: Light
A look at the lousy situation Rhode Island is in, how we got here,
and how we might be able to get out.
Now at bookstores near you, or buy it with the button above ($14,
or $18 with shipping and sales tax).
Contact information below if you'd
like to schedule a book-related event, like a possibly entertaining talk on the
book's subjects, featuring the famous mystery graph.
Join the RIPR Mailing List! For a weekly column and (a few) other
items of interest, click here or send an email to email@example.com.
RIPR is a (paper) newsletter and a weekly column appearing in ten
of Rhode Island's finer newspapers. The goal is to look at local,
state and federal policy issues
that affect life here in the Ocean State, concentrating on action, not
intentions or talk.
If you'd like to help, please contribute
an item, suggest an issue topic, or buy a subscription. If you can,
buy two or three (subscribe here).
Search this site
Available Back Issues:
Issues are issued in paper. They are archived irregularly here.
- Aug 09 (38) - How your government's
economic policies have worked against you. What a fake nineteenth
century nun can teach us about the tea party protests.
- Jun 09 (37) - Statistics of
optimism, the real cost of your government. Judith Reilly on
renewable tax credits. Review of Akerlof and Shiller on behavioral
- Apr 09 (36) - Cap and trade, the
truth behind the card check controversy, review of Governor's tax
policy workgroup final report.
- Feb 09 (35) - The many varieties of
market failures, and what classic economics has to say about them,
review of Nixonland by Rick Perlstein.
- Dec 08 (34) - Can "Housing First"
end homelessness? The perils of TIF. Review of You Can't Be
President by John MacArthur.
- Oct 08 (33) - Wage stagnation,
financial innovation and deregulation: creating the financial
crisis, the political rhetoric of the Medicaid waiver.
- Jul 08 (32) - Where has the money
gone? Could suburban sprawl be part of our fiscal problem? Review
of Bad Money by Kevin Phillips, news trivia or trivial
- Apr 08 (31) - Understanding
homelessness in RI, by Eric Hirsch, market segmentation and the
housing market, the economics of irrationality.
- Feb 08 (30) - IRS migration data,
and what it says about RI, a close look at "entitlements", historic
credit taxonomy, an investment banking sub-primer.
- Dec 07 (29) - A look at the state's
underinsured, economic geography with IRS data.
- Oct 07 (28) - Choosing the most
expensive ways to fight crime, bait and switch tax cuts, review
of Against Prediction, about the perils of using statistics
to fight crime.
- Aug 07 (27) - Sub-prime mortgages
fall heaviest on some neighborhoods, biotech patents in decline, no photo
IDs for voting, review of Al Gore's Against Reason
- Jun 07 (26) - Education
funding, budget secrecy, book review of Boomsday and the Social
Security Trustees' Report
- May 07 (25) - Municipal finance: could citizen
mobility cause high property taxes?
What some Depression-era economists had to say on investment, and why
it's relevant today, again.
- Mar 07 (24) - The state budget
disaster and how we got here. Structural deficit, health care,
borrowing, unfunded liabilities, the works.
- Jan 07 (23) - The impact of real
estate speculation on housing prices, reshaping the electoral college.
Book review of Blocking the Courthouse Door on tort "reform."
- Dec 06 (22) - State deficit: What's
so responsible about this? DOT bonding madness, Quonset, again,
Massachusetts budget comparison.
- Oct 06 (21) - Book review: Out of
Iraq by Geo. McGovern and William Polk, New rules about supervisors
undercut unions, New Hampshire comparisons, and November referenda guide.
- Aug 06 (20) - Measuring teacher
quality, anti-planning referenda and the conspiracy to promote them,
affordable housing in the suburbs, union elections v. card checks.
- Jun 06 (19) - Education report, Do
tax cut really shrink government?, Casinos and constitutions, State historic tax
credit: who uses it.
- May 06 (18) - Distribution
analysis of property taxes by town, critique of RIEDC statistics,
how to reform health care, and how not to.
- Mar 06 (17) - Critique of commonly
used statistics: RI/MA rich people disparity, median income, etc.
Our economic dependence on high health care spending. Review of
Crashing the Gate
- Feb 06 (16) - Unnecessary
accounting changes mean disaster ahead for state and towns, reforming
property tax assessment, random state budget notes.
- Jan 06 (15) - Educational equity,
estimating the amount of real estate speculation in Rhode Island,
interview with Thom Deller, Providence's chief planner.
- Nov 05 (14) - The distribution of
affordable houses and people who need them, a look at RI's affordable
- Sep 05 (13) - A solution to pension
strife, review of J.K. Galbraith biography and why we should care.
- Jul 05 (12) - Kelo v. New London:
Eminent Domain, and what's between the lines in New London.
- Jun 05 (11) - Teacher salaries,
Veterinarian salaries and the
minimum wage. Book review: Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
- Apr 05 (10) - Choosing a crisis: Tax fairness and school
funding, suggestions for reform. Book review: business location and
- Feb 05 (9) - State and teacher
pension costs kept artificially high. Miscellaneous tax suggestions for balancing the state budget.
- Dec 04 (8) - Welfare applications and the iconography of welfare
department logos. The reality of the Social Security trust fund.
- Oct 04 (7) - RIPTA and DOT, who's really in crisis?
- Aug 04 (6) - MTBE and well pollution, Mathematical problems with property taxes
- May 04 (5) - A look at food-safety issues: mad cows, genetic engineering, disappearing farmland.
- Mar 04 (4) - FY05 RI State Budget Critique.
- Feb 04 (3) - A close look at the Blue Cross of RI annual statement.
- Oct 03 (2) - Taxing matters, a historical overview of tax burdens in Rhode Island
- Oct 03 Appendix - Methodology notes and sources for October issue
- Apr 03 (1) - FY04 RI State Budget critique
For those of you who can read english and understand it, the following
is an email address you are welcome to use. If you are a web bot, we hope
you can't understand it, and that's the point of writing it this way.
The Rhode Island Policy Reporter is an independent news source that
specializes in the technical issues of public policy that matter so
much to all our lives, but that also tend not to be reported very
well or even at all. The publication is owned and operated by Tom
Sgouros, who has written all the text you'll find on this site,
except for the articles with actual bylines.
Fri, 23 Jun 2006
New issue out
- What is the historic tax credit, what does it do and how much
does it really cost us. -By Mike Lozano, of the Greater Elmwood
- Changes in federal budget practice since 1980. What did the
Reagan Revolution really bring? (Surprise bonus: I agree with the
director of the Cato Institute, though
I'm not sure he agrees with me.)
- Laws to benefit individuals. Where are they? And does the
constitution deserve amendment for a Casino?
Didn't you mean to subscribe?
11:42 - 23 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Thu, 15 Jun 2006
The Shape of the Starting Line
The policy review on improving education in Rhode Island can be found
It is widely acknowledged that education in Rhode Island isn't
working well for all children. Even partisans of the public education
system acknowledge that the costs are high and performance seems low
for the investment. This is especially true in the kinds of
comparisons to other states that are commonly made. A litany of
statistics makes the point: teacher salaries here are high compared to
the median wage, school test scores are low compared to national
averages and so on. The statistics are made familiar by endless
repetition on talk shows, in political speeches and in the newspaper.
Under this blizzard of numbers lie some troubling truths. Yes, it
is true that many urban schools in Rhode Island do not perform up to
national averages. And yes, it is true that schools in Rhode
Island are on average more expensive to run relative to many other
Unfortunately, these facts, in combination with the preconceptions
of the legislature, city and town councils and the public, have helped
to create an environment where the schools that need the most help get
less and less of it every year, creating, in essence, two Rhode
Islands. In one Rhode Island, high property values and relatively
lower taxes allow the schools to get the support they need, or at
least close to it. In the other Rhode Island---where 35% of our
children live---a dwindling tax base and concomitant high property
taxes combine to create a situation where schools struggle to provide
the basic services, let alone perform to the high standards enshrined
by new laws like No Child Left Behind. In recent years, school
performance all over Rhode Island seems to be improving, if slightly,
but the gap between the richest school districts and the poorest is
not shrinking, and the urban districts remain far below the state
average while the wealthier districts are above the national averages.
Read more here.
11:19 - 15 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Mon, 12 Jun 2006
Blame is not a policy
From an article
in Salon by Walter Shapiro (sub. req.):
Yes, the invasion and occupation of Iraq was a terrible mistake, undertaken
by the Bush high command for paranoid reasons and conducted with
stunning and willful incompetence.
But, in political terms, there is little to be gained by constantly
looking backward to 2003 with a sense of self-righteous
vindication. Don Baer, who was Bill Clinton's White House
communications director, shrewdly points out, "Saying 'I told you so'
is not an action plan."
Yes, but saying, "Saying 'I told you so' is not an action plan."
is an action plan for keeping people who were right in 2003
from having any chance to share their opinions now.
12:24 - 12 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Sat, 10 Jun 2006
Maybe they'll believe the Census Bureau
According to the
Rhode Island's taxes per capita are quite a bit lower than our
neighbors. On their list, we're twelfth, behind Vermont (1),
Connecticut (4), and Massachusetts (7).
Regular readers will know that I'm skeptical of rankings like
this—this is state taxes only, and there is no accounting for
the distribution—but it's still good to remember that state
taxes in Massachusetts are higher than they are here.
15:39 - 10 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Wed, 07 Jun 2006
Do tax cuts reduce the size of government?
The June issue of the Atlantic Monthly contained an article
(subscription required, but you can read the first two paragraphs
free) about a forthcoming article by William Niskanen, the director of
the libertarian Cato
Institute. In it, Niskanen reviews the theoretical foundation
behind the idea that cutting taxes is a sensible step in reducing the
size of government, as well as the practical history since the
beginning of the Reagan administration. What he finds is that the
theoretical foundation has been pushed by economists who ought to know
better, and by people who choose to ignore what has actually happened
since 1980. In short, neither theory nor practice support the idea.
So what has happened since 1980? Well, as taxes have fallen,
spending has risen, and when taxes have risen, spending has fallen.
This sounds odd, but it's true. Reagan and the Bushes have given us
bigger government with higher deficits, and Clinton gave us smaller
government with a surplus (Bush I did make a stab in this direction,
and was crucified by his own party for it.)
In other words, there is a fundamental dishonesty associated with
campaigns that promise to "cut taxes" but won't tell us what
programs are to be slashed to pay for the cuts. In a nutshell, the
risk is if you cut the taxes first, what people see is that government
appears cheaper, and they demand more of it. Furthermore, this is as
true in Rhode Island's budget as in the federal budget. RI can't run
deficits, but we can pass phased-in tax cuts, where the deficit is
next year, and borrow inappropriately, and both of these
activities have been part of unsuccessful efforts to rein in the cost
of government over the past fifteen years.
Remember, this is a finding by the director of one of the
Republican party's favorite think tanks.
More to come.
09:08 - 07 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Sat, 03 Jun 2006
A reply to Carol Mumford
Rep. Carol Mumford feels free to criticize me for an argument I did
not make and an opinion I do not hold. The article she criticizes is
below. Should she have looked at the article just before the one she
criticizes in issue 18,
she would have seen data that clearly support her contention that
Rhode Island tax policy is unkind to the firefighters, police and
merchants on whom the health of our communities depends.
The proposition we should be debating is the one put out by the
Finance Committee this year: does the data support their contention
that cutting the income taxes on the top 1% of Rhode Island taxpayers
will improve the economy, our tax collections, or the lot of working
people in Rhode Island? I'd like to see a defense of that
proposition, instead of attacks on people who wonder whether the
happiness of the rich is really the key to prosperity for everyone
else. She doesn't make that defense, but settles for attacking me for
opinions I don't hold instead of replying to the actual arguments in
the actual article I actually wrote.
As far as the question of whether rich people are leaving the
state, which is what has everyone so worked up this year, maybe they
are, maybe they aren't. The data I have says that tax policy may
indeed be a reason the wealthy decamp, but it's the property tax at
issue. (But it's not like we're actually losing rich people,
though we're not gaining them as fast as Massachusetts.) But I
wouldn't say I've seen data that makes the argument by itself. All
I've seen is questionable statistics like the one that is the subject
of the article below. Read it and decide for yourself.
Taking apart another statistic
Another statistic appearing in the tax debate this year is the
claim that over the period from 1995 to 2002, the average income of
the top 1% of taxpayers in Rhode Island appears to have declined,
while the average income of that top o' the top in Massachusetts seems
to have increased. This statistic comes to us courtesy the RI
Economic Development Corporation (EDC), who deduced it from two
reports published by the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy
(ITEP) in Washington. Unfortunately, the 1995 ITEP report was an
analysis of all non-elderly married couples and the 2002 ITEP report
was for all non-elderly taxpayers, so they don't quite match.
EDC told RIPR, in defense of this statistic, that there are so few
taxpayers at the very top of the income distribution who are not
married couples that the incompatiblity is negligible. This, of
course, is absurd. The definition of where any percentile begins and
ends depends not only on the members of that percentile, but also on
all the other members of the set under analysis. If I have five balls
in each of ten ordered bins, then the top ten percent is one bin's
worth of five balls, and on average, they're in bin ten. But if I
dump 50 more balls in the bottom bin, the top ten percent is now ten
balls: two bins' worth, average nine and a half. The average value of
the top ten percent has dropped, despite no change at all in those top
After presenting the top 1% decline statistic in a hearing before the
House Finance committee, EDC was cautioned by an ITEP economist not to
compare those two reports directly, but they have continued to promote
it in press releases and editorials. In fact, IRS data show that,
between 1995 and 2001, the income of the top 1% of taxpayers in Rhode
Island rose by about 51%. Further analysis by ITEP itself shows that
the average income of the top 1% rose 78% between 1995 and 2005.
(Their number for the 1995-2001 span was 54%.) Andy Cutler, EDC's
spokesman, assures me that EDC stands by their analysis, but couldn't
say why to prefer it over the contradictory IRS data.
This point of elementary statistics is important not just as a way
of scolding EDC for carelessness and intellectual perfidy, but also as
a valuable rule to remember when comparing percentiles: the movement
of a percentile's average income depends not only on the members of
that percentile, but also on everyone else. Looking at IRS data
between 1995 and 2001, Massachusetts experienced higher growth among
the very rich than Rhode Island did. But Rhode Island experienced
substantially higher growth among people earning between $100,000 and
$200,000 (well above the national average, too) as well as in many
lower brackets. We simply added more taxpayers over that time than
Massachusetts (up 6.9% vs 5.0%) and more than most states. This is
exactly the same as adding balls to the bottom bin to lower the
average of the top. IRS data says that our wealthiest taxpayers got
richer as fast or faster than their counterparts in Massachusetts, but
statistics that look at the top 1% won't catch that because the
effect will be overwhelmed by the taxpayers Rhode Island added in the
Obviously, contradicting EDC's data analysis isn't the same as
claiming that our roads are paved with gold and our sidewalks strewn
with rose petals. Serious problems beset our state, and our tax
system is among them. But RIPR continues to believe that our problems
will only be solved through intellectually honest analysis, and that
ignoring the available evidence is irresponsible and serves no one
The actual article in the actual newsletter accompanies this with a
lovely picture and some other interesting articles, including a table
that shows how much property tax people pay in every town, according
to their income, and another article showing four steps our state
could take to achieve universal health care coverage at a reasonable
cost. Why don't you subscribe?
Update: Advanced to be at the top of the page when the Projo allows my
17:38 - 03 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Do you trust the results of the 2004 election?
It's always been hard to reconcile the faith in exit polls that led us
(I mean the US government) to condemn the "election" of
Victor Yuschenko's opponent in Ukraine with the widely expressed
confidence that the best-financed exit polls around were all wrong
during the 2004 presidential campaign here. What's with that? Do we
trust the technique or not?
So go read Robert Kennedy's
in Rolling Stone this month. And then see if you can't think of the
simplest possible way to reconcile the two.
Update: Choosing to focus on the narrow question of whether
Republican machinations were responsible for the many irregularities,
a writer at Salon writes
that the Rolling Stone article is silly. But the question of trusting
the results stands. Even if the only reason this was relevant is the
fatuous interpretations of the last election results by the nation's
pundits, that would be enough.
17:20 - 03 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Fri, 02 Jun 2006
A Nebraska City councillor is caught being honest about cutting taxes.
She plans to cut libraries, schools, bus routes, parks. This is
awful, but at least she's being honest. Around here, people only
propose these general "solutions" like the recently passed
proposal to hold city and town property taxes down. Like the honest
councillor in Nebraska, this law will cut services that lots of people
like. Unlike her, the proponents of this law are fundamentally
dishonest, because they won't say what is to be cut.
Anyone who says they support the tax limits should be asked: what
will you cut? If they shrug, or say "it's up to the local
councils" or otherwise fudge, you know they don't have the
courage to say to your face what they really mean. Is that who we
want running the show?
09:14 - 02 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Thu, 01 Jun 2006
Does poverty breed dependence?
There is some evidence,
but as usual, it does not comfort the "conservative" activists.
11:46 - 01 Jun 2006 [/y6/jn]
Ads and the like:
Rhode Island 101
(A funny book you should own)